Skip to main content

A Brief on National Security Act, 1980 | By Shiksha Negi


A spate of recent attacks on and impropriety towards the individuals, who are performing their duties with all their dedication and by imperiling their lives has brought the National Security Act (NSA) again at the center of attention. Some of the state governments have slapped the stringent provisions of the NSA against such miscreants to curb any further alike incidents.
Invoking NSA in the current situation can be called a pressing need but it is not the case always. Every coin has two sides, similarly, the NSA remains in the news for both good as well as bad reasons.
Let's see how.

What actually the National Security Act is?


National Security Act is an act of the Indian parliament enacted on 23rd September 1980 during the Indira Gandhi government with a view to providing for preventive detention in certain matters  prejudicial to national security and also for the sorry state of affairs where India faces various security threats like terrorism, Naxalism and various separatist movements that threaten its unity and integrity.

Article22(3)(b) of the constitution allows for preventive detention and restrictions on personal liberty for reasons of state security and public order. The act consists of eighteen sections and extends to the whole of India.

Provisions under the Act 


In plain language, the Act licenses the central government and the state governments to detain a person to prevent him/her from acting in any manner against the welfare and security of the country, damaging amicable relations with foreign countries, obstructing the maintenance of  supplies and services essential to the country.

A person can also be detained to prevent him from disrupting public order or the peace and tranquility of India.
The maximum period for which a person may be detained in pursuance of any detention order under the act is twelve months from the date of detention but the term can be extended if any fresh evidence is found. If having regard to the circumstances prevailing or likely to prevail in any area within the local jurisdiction of a District Magistrate or a commissioner of Police, the state government is satisfied that it is necessary to do so, it may, by an order in writing, direct, that during such period as may be specified in the order, such District Magistrate or Commissioner of Police may also exercise this power and arrest individuals under the NSA.

‌Historical background of the Act 


The concept of Preventive Detention is not a new thing for India. The law's framework dates back to 1818 when the Bengal Regulation III was enacted to empower the British government to arrest anyone for maintenance of public order without giving the person recourse to judicial proceedings. Then came in 1919, the Anarchical and Revolutionary Crimes Act of 1919 popularly known as the Rowlatt act or black act that allowed confinement of a suspect without trial.

The purpose of the act was to restrict the growing nationalist onrush in the country. It gave enormous powers to the police to arrest any person without any valid reason.
Post-Independence, the first preventive detention rule was brought by the government of Jawahar Lal Nehru in 1950.
After the act expired in the year 1969, the then Prime Minister, Indira Gandhi, brought in the controversial Maintenance of Internal Security Act (MISA) in 1971. After the MISA got repealed in 1977 during the reign of the Janata Party, the National Security Act came into force in the year 1980.

Normal Scenario v. NSA 

In the normal course, on arrest, the person is guaranteed certain basic rights which are:

  1. Under Section 50 of the Criminal Procedure Code 1973 the person arrested has to be informed of the grounds of arrest, and has the right to bail.
  2. As per Section 56 of CrPc a police officer making an arrest without warrant shall, without unnecessary delay, take the person arrested before a Magistrate having jurisdiction in the case, or before the officer in charge of a police station.
  3. Section 57 of Cr.PC guarantees the person arrested to be presented before the officers within 24 hours exclusive of the time necessary for the journey.
  4. Also, article 22(1) of the Constitution allows the detainee to seek legal advice from a legal practitioner of his choice.
However, under the NSA, a suspect cannot avail himself of any of the above-mentioned rights and could be kept uninformed about the reasons for his arrest for up to five days and in exceptional circumstances not later than ten days. Even when providing the grounds for arrest, the government can withhold information which it considers to be against public interest to disclose. The arrested person is also not entitled to the aid of any legal practitioner in any matter connected with the proceedings before an advisory board, which is constituted by the government for dealing with NSA cases.

Concerns 

Any law giving such extraordinary and immense powers in the hands of the executive increases its chance of being used arbitrarily. Many times this power becomes an attempt to use the state machinery to silence the voice they don't like trampling the constitutional rights of the citizens.
NSA has repeatedly come under criticism for the way it is used. Recently when a journalist in Manipur was jailed under the National Security Act for posting an allegedly offensive video criticizing the government, despite being granted bail by the judge when initially arrested under IPC, drew huge criticism by many of the prominent human rights activists. A section argues that several cases like this point to the fact that the government sometimes uses these stringent acts as an extra-judicial power.
Additionally, the National Crimes Record Bureau (NCRB) which collects and analyses crime data in the country doesn't include cases under NSA in its data as no FIRs are registered. Hence, no figures are available for the exact number of detentions under the act which again can make one think upon the potential abuse of the law.

Conclusion 

Misuse of a law doesn't mean it should necessarily be repealed, instead, proper checks and balances should be brought in place to curb the misuse. Proper training of law enforcement agencies is needed to guide them about where a particular section needs to be applied and where it is not necessary. There needs to be a balance between the security of the state and basic rights of the citizens. While national security is paramount, the central government must ensure that the harsh provisions of the National Security Act are not misused to quell democratic dissent as the vibrancy of our democracy depends on it.

References:

  1. https://the logical indian.com/tli-explains/nsa
  2. https://indiacode.nic.in
  3. https://www.indiatoday.in


Shiksha Negi
B.A.LL.B (Hons)
2019-24
Law Faculty
Banaras Hindu University 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dynamics of COVID-19 & Lessons to be Learned | By Parnika Rai

Whilst battling an ongoing pandemic, learning the lessons it has to offer is as important a parameter as is tackling the predicament. Coronavirus is an extremely relevant topic in today’s contemporary era. The news is ripe with the acceleration of cases at a rampant pace, across the globe. The Dynamics of the pandemic has been intriguing and overcoming this gruesome storm is the prima facie goal of the government and the citizens. However, before delving deep into the topic it is imperative to gain background. What is Coronavirus? Where did it originate from? What has its trend been globally and nationally? Coronavirus is a family of viruses that causes respiratory illness in any living organism. The recent disease caused by this virus is Covid-19, the carrier of which is SARS-Cov-2 . Many theories of its origin have been propounded worldwide, however, the most accepted is the one which says where the virus is said to be originated in the Wuhan Seafood Market. The first case is ...

National Emergency With Respect to Article 352 of the Indian Constitution | By Tripti Singh

The reign of Indira Gandhi in India has been historical be it because of her valiant attitude that led to the formation of Bangladesh or the successful introduction of Green Revolution which made India self-sufficient in food grains. She had a really glorious career as a politician but that can be said only if we overlook that period which is said to be the “darkest phase” of Indian democracy. Yes, I am talking about the biggest blot on her political career, the time when she imposed an emergency arbitrarily to suppress the opposition. We all have grown up hearing stories of that time which have seemed to be very intriguing and shocking at the same time as such events are pretty unusual in a democracy like India. The mechanism of emergency is quite intricate and has many aspects to it. Having heard such stories, it also becomes important to delve into these aspects to have a better understanding. So, let us have a look at this part of the Constitution which has always been supremely...

Speaking the Taboo: Mental Health and related Law in India | By Saumya Sonkar

In the current situation of the COVID-19 pandemic, mental health is an issue that has drastically affected people all over the world. People are facing depression, stress, and anxiety which is because of disruption in the daily routine of people. Although mental health is generally considered a common term, many conditions that doctors recognize as psychological disorders have physical roots. Many casualties have also happened due to mental illness during these difficult times. People have different opinions and thoughts about this where some are correct while others are simple myths. First, let’s look at its definition. Definition Mental health refers to cognitive, behavioral, and emotional well-being. It is all about how people think, feel, and behave. People sometimes use the term “mental health” to mean the absence of a mental disorder. According to WHO, “Mental health is a state of well-being in which an individual realizes his or her own abilities can cope with the normal str...